June 15, 2001

Miscellaneous Subjects 90: 1. Steven Greer on Art Bell Friday/Saturday June 15-16, 2001 + 2. Seeing it Differently + 3. Flashpoint: First Total Solar Eclipse of the New Millennium 06/21 + 4. Just a second for peace + 5. New England School Challenges Old Myths + 6. Skinned is Skinned - There is no Correct Leather + 7. Global Resource Action Center for the Environment (GRACE) Calls for a Tax on Meat + 8. Bush's aid to the Taliban + 9. Mysterious Contrails 2001 Events - June 23 Rally Against Chemtrails

Hello everyone

I did not have much time this week to prepare compilations because I've been working hard on something important which I believe will be really pivotal for many people in the near future -- and which I'll be very glad to finally announce to you next week.

The very best is yet to come ;-)

Jean Hudon
Earth Rainbow Network Coordinator

"All wars are civil wars, because all men are brothers... Each of us owes infinitely more to the human race than to the particular country in which we were born."

- Francois Fenelon, theologian and writer (1651-1715)

Note: A good news regarding an issue I previously covered last year about the U.S. bombing range in Vieques, Puerto Rico...

Bush to Announce Halt to Vieques Exercises

You may also want to check the latest Media Compilation I just sent at

It is about our food safety now jeopardized by a combination of corporate greed, political corruption, fraudulent science and subservient media.



From: "Announcements" <announcements@disclosureproject.org>
Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2001
Subject: Steven Greer on Art Bell Friday/Saturday June 15-16, 2001

Steven Greer will be on the Art Bell radio program (http://www.artbell.com) on Friday night June 15 into early morning on Sat. June 16 from 2 a.m. - 4 a.m. Eastern time. [11pm -1 am Pacific time, 6 a.m. - 8 a.m. GMT]

He will be discussing the status of the Disclosure Project.

You can listen to it live, or via the Internet, or later via the archives on Art Bell's web site.


From: SandozB@aol.com
Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001
Subject: Seeing it Differently

Dear Jean, I would appreciate it if you would share this with your conscious awakening list. I think you will be particularly interested in the second letter to the senators.

With thanks and aloha,



Dear Envisioners,

The letter below explains the seriousness of the sonar problem in our oceans to the group of senators who are now forming their priorities for the new Senate Leadership. If you need to be more intensely inspired to consciously call positive energies and visions of vitality and aliveness to our oceans, then read this letter.

If you already understand the enormity of the sonar problem facing all marine life as well as the oceans and ourselves, then you will be highly motivated to join in this brief but powerful exercise.

Once you understand the critical nature of this potential holocaust beneath the sea, you will feel motivated to use the power of your intention to reverse this possibility simply by "seeing it differently." I personally like to envision a full planetary of the healing of the human heart and to see the dolphins and whales punctuating the moment of the shift by dancing joyfully along our world's shores and horizons.

To put our awareness to even more powerful use in achieving a viable ocean, we can focus specifically on our new Senate Leadership to embrace the dangers of the sonar program and to move quickly and clearly to stop it.

Following is the letter written to the new Senate Leadership explaining the seriousness of the current sonar problem for those who are not yet fully informed about its serious consequences.

With my thanks and aloha for joining me in this envisioning goal,

Bobbie Sandoz



Dear Senator

As you set the new priorities for the Senate Committee, I want to call your personal attention to one of the most serious issues that needs immediate attention: the imminent full-scale deployment of a new Navy technology (LFAS) that threatens all marine life, the entire ocean ecosystem and subsequently all organic life. Its likely ramifications pose a threat to the well-being of our domestic food supply, the global environment, our international relations, foreign trade and our economic and social system. Although you may think that sounds preposterous, please read on.

As my book Listening to Wild Dolphins was going to press I became aware of the new military sonars planned for deployment in 80% of our world‚s oceans. I intuitively knew this high risk technology posed perhaps the most serious threat to the chain of life since the mass extinctions of species millions of years ago. Knowing that massive deaths in ocean species could very well threaten our own, I spent the next few months studying the new sonars in order to better understand why I had experienced this premonition.

I learned that it is an extremely complex subject deliberately made more confusing by a lack of media coverage and apparent efforts by the Administration to cover-up[ the data on the effects of their tests. I also learned a number of things as listed in my Appendix that revealed preliminary aspects of why my premonition of an undersea holocaust would come true if this high risk technology was allowed to continue.

My belief that the new brand of sonars would not only kill cetaceans but all marine life and the ocean itself was deemed a rash overstatement by the small environmental group looking into this issue at the time I became involved, and they were concerned that my assertion of this possibility might undermine their credibility.

Yet my knowing was so strong that I refused to be politic and relentlessly suggested that if the environmentalists would intercept the NMFS practice of destroying stranded cetacean carcasses in order to hide evidence of sonar exposure, that they would be able to prove my theory.

Perhaps not coincidentally, in March of 2001 a number of sonar exposed whales in the Abacos stranded on the beachfront property of two environmental scientists who were able to work outside of the NMFS jurisdiction and assure that these whales receive independent autopsies. As expected, the results of these tests offered proof that the military sonar activity in the area had indeed killed the whales. This got the attention of other environmentalists, and they have coalesced their efforts to make you aware of this more serious danger of the sonar program.

Now the second half of my premonition that the sonar can destroy all marine life is being explained by increased awareness of such things as the use of time-mirrored techniques, combining multiple range and frequency of exposure, and the role of resonance in regard to cavity and tissue explosion in fish and other marine life. Thus it is becoming increasingly apparent that this high risk technology offers a power that would not only wipe out the cetacean species, but could trigger the most far-reaching destruction yet wrought on this planet.

Yet in spite of the broadly lethal nature of this program, NMFS has been doing all it can to pave the way for the Navy to rush to full deployment before those who are in a position to block it understand the full impact of this most critical issue now facing our world.

With no opposition to this pell-mell rush to deployment from the former Senate leadership, it seemed that we were destined to destroy our oceans and then be faced with absorbing the horror, pain, and regret over what we had done. But now there is a new opportunity for reason to prevail, and I am hopeful that your group will awaken in time to stop the insanity of this self-destructive force.

Please read the material in the Appendix and let me know if I may be helpful to committee staff in any follow-up you deem appropriate.


Bobbie Sandoz


Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001
From: lightshift@aol.com

Flashpoint: The First Total Solar Eclipse of the New Millenium 06/21

By Ken Kalb

From ancient times, eclipses have been viewed as markers of powerful changes ahead. As the celestial luminaries block each other and darken the light, eclipses elicit an ominous flavor. There are commonly four eclipses every year -- two solar and two lunar — though there are exceptions. Major eclipses are demarcations between a former cycle and a dawning new one. They are flashpoints of energy escalating consciousness over an evolutionary bridge. Total eclipses are caused by planetary conjunctions, the most powerful of aspect alignments. With this Total Solar Eclipse occurring right on the First Solstice of the New Millennium, we are indeed on the cusp of a rare and significant cosmic conjunction.

CLIP - To read the rest go at http://www.luckystarz.com/solstice_eclipse.html


From: "Wayne Umbertis" <wayne@savesite.net>
Subject: Just a second for peace
Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001

It's the thought energy that moves mountains.


Much love and wondrous things,


A click a day keeps the saws away http://www.saverainforest.net


Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2001
Subject: Global Village News & Resources for June 11, 2001
From: GVNR <gvnrresponder@list.internetgazette.net>

The Global Village News & Resources is published twice a month by Network 2012 in cooperation with the Savesite Network. For more information, go to: http://www.n2012.com/gvn/index.htm - For more information contact Michael at lightweave@aol.com


New England School Challenges Old Myths

USA - Sudbury Valley School, in Framingham, Massachusetts, was found in 1970. Class attendance is not required, and is in fact, rare. There are no exams, no grades, the school is governed democratically and all participants are guaranteed the freedoms granted in the US Bill of Rights. Is it successful? Studies of alumni show them to be 'successful' by any criteria; most have gone on to their first choice career or college, most have a comfortable income, and most are, by their own definition, happy people.

Sudbury is located in a beautiful Victorian mansion on a ten-acre campus. It is furnished like a home, with couches, easy chairs, books everywhere (rather than hidden in a library), etc. The well groomed grounds provide an excellent setting for sport and games.

As a private school, it relies totally upon tuition fees for operational expenses (which are less than half the per-pupil cost of the local public schools), and refuses grants or government money. It is accredited by the New England Association of Schools and Colleges to award a high school diploma.

Sudbury is located in a beautiful Victorian mansion on a ten-acre campus. It is furnished like a home, with couches, easy chairs, books everywhere (rather than hidden in a library), etc. The well groomed grounds provide an excellent setting for sport and games.

Students (from age four and up) are free to do as they wish during the day within the context of the school rules that they themselves created. The campus is "open" and people may come and go as they please, without having to check with ìofficials."

Students, staff & teachers are equal in every regard, a fact reflected in everyoneís use of first names in communicating. The school is governed democratically by the School Meeting that meets weekly, and is made up of students and staff, each of whom have one vote in decision making. The School Meeting decides all matters of consequence. It elects administrative officers from among its own members, with no distinction between students and staff regarding eligibility. It also makes decision pertaining to school rules, financial expenditures, hiring and firing staff, and so on. Its fiscal responsibility includes preparing the annual budget, which is forwarded to the School Assembly for approval.

The School Assembly meets annually and is made up of students, staff, and parents of students. As most parents pay tuition, it is considered only reasonable to give them some voice in the use of their money). It must approve the budget (submitted by the school meeting) which includes tuition rates, staff salaries, etc. It also votes on whether or not to award a diploma to any students that have requested one. The Assembly is also the broad policy-making body of the school.

Within the school, the rules are enforced by a judicial system composed of a Judicial Committee made up of two student officers elected every two months, four students selected randomly every month and a staff member who is allowed input, but no vote. The Judicial Committee investigates complaints and presses charges when necessary. If the Judicial Committee finds someone guilty, and the person pleads innocent, there will be a trial. If a person pleads guilty or is found guilty by the trial, the accused is sentenced by the Judicial Committee. Verdicts and sentences deemed unfair by the accused (or others, for that matter) may be brought before the school meeting.

All school meeting members are equal before the law. In fact, the first guilty verdict ever was against staff members. Typical sentences are things like "can't go outside for two days", "can't enter the upstairs for a week", etc.

And why does Sudbury work? People naturally learn to deal with the environment in which they are placed. In a place with grades, where knowledge is spoon-fed to them and they never have any reason to make use of it apart from passing a test, students will learn to get good grades whether that means learning to cheat, or learning how to 'cram' for a test). When they are treated like prisoners they learn to ìwork the system."

On the other hand, In a place where people do what they want, they find the intrinsic value of knowledge. In a place where they are treated as adult human beings, they learn to assume personal responsibility both for themselves and the group as a whole. Perhaps this is why so many Sudbury alumni become politically active in later life and often go into the helping professions.

(Adapted from an article by Scott D. Gray. The Sudbury Valley School. sdg@sudval.org; web: http://www.sudval.org).


Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2001
From: "Jackie Alan Giuliano, Ph.D." <jackie@deepteaching.com>
Subject: Skinned is Skinned - There is no Correct Leather


Rationalizations. Without them, many of us probably couldn't get through the day. They are comfortable and convenient, but many of them may be resulting in continued suffering of the Earth's creatures and delay in our own reconnection with the natural world.

Many people labor under the erroneous assumption that leather products are acceptable because they are a necessary byproduct of the food industry. The reality of the leather trade trashes these comfortable notions and leather production may be the cruelest, most unnecessary of all evils perpetrated upon our animal neighbors, causing more suffering than any other issue.

I discuss the use of leather in this week's Healing Our World article, "Skinned is Skinned - There is no Correct Leather," online at the Environment News Service at http://ens-news.com/ens/jun2001/2001L-06-08g.html.

Leather results in huge environmental impacts to our air, water, and earth and many people suffer needlessly each year being poisoned from byproducts of this industry. And it takes 3,000 cows to supply the National Football League (NFL) with enough leather for a year's supply of footballs, even though a number of alternatives are available.

Leather is a symbol of success and affluence in the U.S. Having the means to wear the skin of something that has been killed is a deeply rooted sign of power over the natural world. But leather symbolizes our distance from nature as well as the cruelty of its production.

Learn about alternatives to leather and ways to eliminate it from your life. Doing so will remove one more obstacle that keeps us from experiencing a deep connection to the natural world. I think it's all about compassion. What things can we do in our life to make our actions statements of compassion?

I wish you peace.

Jackie Alan Giuliano, Ph.D.




Date: Fri, 08 Jun 2001
From: Mark Graffis <mgraffis@vitelcom.net>
Subject: Global Resource Action Center for the Environment (GRACE) Calls for a Tax on Meat

Friday, June 8, 2001

NEW YORK -- According to David Brubaker of the Henry Spira/GRACE Project on Industrial Animal Production at Johns Hopkins University's Center for a Livable Future in the School of Public Health, America's systematic disregard of corporate accountability for the devastating consequences of contemporary industrial animal farming must be immediately and substantially addressed.


* In 2001, Industrial Animal Producers (IAPs) are the source for most of the meat Americans eat at home and in restaurants every day-though the public is little aware of exactly what this means.

* IAPs-termed Confined Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs) by the EPA-are officially defined as having at least 1000 "animal units," equivalent to 700 dairy cows or 2,500 hogs, though they often contain many times those numbers, crammed into cages, boxes, and vegetation-less outdoor pens.

- The USDA reports that animals in the U.S. meat industry produce 61 million tons of waste each year, which is 130 times the volume of human waste generated in the same period. One IAP alone yields the waste equivalent to the output of a 12,000-person town, though they exist on a fraction of the land.

Consolidated meat processing firms are the driving force behind the IAPs. Comprising suited executives, remote stockholders, and hapless, transient employees working under notoriously hazardous conditions, the industry imposes a system that spews pollution and chemicals into our rivers, streams, and bodies, all in the name of farming. The industry uses legal loopholes, massive government lobbies, and charismatic subterfuge to evade pollution responsibilities while garnering the lion's share of federal and state subsidies nominally intended to aid American farmers-all paid with hundreds of billions of taxpayer dollars per year.

- "Today, 20 feedlots feed 50 percent of the cattle and are directly connected to the four processing firms that control 81 percent of beef processing, either by direct ownership or through formal contracts," reported researchers from University of Missouri, at the beginning of this year. According to the San Francisco Chronicle, similar figures apply to poultry and hog production, where four corporations control half of the chicken market, and four processing firms control 75 percent of the hog business.

- In 1998, while independent farmers were receiving the lowest prices since the great depression, Smithfield Foods, IBP, and Hormel Foods (first, second and fifth largest hog packers, respectively) announced record profits gained via the processing-rather than the raising-of livestock.

* Economists and environmentalists alike report, over and over, that the IAP-based model shifts the processes and burden of food production into a rigid and precarious structure designed to make a very small percentage of people very wealthy - at a cost to the environment, public health, and taxpayers that far outweighs the perceived efficiency of the IAP institution.

* Amid the prevailing furor over mad cow or Bovine Spongiform Encephaly (BSE) and foot-and-mouth diseases, Americans are fast being forced to look beyond tidy packages and cheap prices on grocery store shelves.

* The unregulated, overuse of subtherapeutic antibiotics by IAPs has caused The World Health Organization (WHO), The Center for Disease Control (CDC), The Union of Concerned Scientists (USC), and many other national and international health agencies to issue alerts to the acute possibility that antibiotic abuse will render crucial, life-saving drugs useless within the next ten years. Approximately 13.5 millions pounds of antimicrobials prohibited in the European Union are used for nontherapeutic purposes every year by U.S. livestock producers.

- Food-borne illnesses, specifically Salmonella and Campylobacter, are on the rise in the U.S. while the occurrence in humans of formerly treatable infections that resist traditional antibiotic therapy have increased in the last decade.

* What economists call "hidden" or "external" costs thoroughly saturate the production and sale of meat in this country. Loss of skilled farmers' livelihoods, termination of free markets, crumbling community structures, suffering animals, mass-scale environmental degradation, and untold health risks all amount to an enormous cost that must be quantified to a degree that the American public will recognize.


Ideally, Americans will one day realize that we rely far too heavily on meat in our national diet, to our health and economic detriment. It is necessary now to address the demand that drives supply. We propose an excise tax levied on IAP-produced meat to help balance the scheme that protects the current system from experiencing any meaningful alteration.

Justification for the tax would follow a line similar to that by which recent cigarette tax legislation succeeded, whereby the product is identified as both an economic burden and a harm to human health. While our government behaves as though its hands are tied when called upon to enforce environmental and anti-trust laws in the farming industry, a clear-cut excise tax could definitively untwist the knot. "Excise taxes are usually easier to enact and enforce," economist Bill Weida explains, "because they hold out the promise that if the taxed entity cleans up its act (literally) it can avoid the tax. Further, they can be enacted in stages, which give the taxed entity time to rectify the problem before the full tax hits. The hooker here is that if the factory farms did clean up their acts, the increased cost would make them non-competitive with conventional farms." The portion of the tax cost that IAP processors transfer to retail prices at any stage would raise the cost of the meat, making conventionally raised, free-range, organic meat competitively priced on grocery store shelves. Consumers would therefore encounter a tangible distinction between IAP meat and organic, free-range meat.

The window of opportunity in which to purposefully enact this tax is narrow. Traditional farmers are a vanishing resource. Environmental and water-reserve losses, accompanied by the impending antibiotic crisis, pose irretrievable losses. As corporate hegemony overtakes retail outlets, the grocery stores that sell meat will be owned by the same parent companies that process the meat, thereby ensuring a retail freeze-out of independent farmers.

A change in prices via an excise tax is sure to speak to Americans through our most sensitive receptor: our pockets. It has worked to curb teenage smoking, it could certainly work for customers provided with a better alternative. When customers alter their spending habits, the industries are quick to respond in suit. Let's make it one that truly fits the needs of our country.

We call for a national dialogue on the development of this tax to encourage a fair and healthy American food supply.

For details on how you can get involved, contact David Brubaker by phone at (717) 627-7789 or email DBRUBAK@aol.com.

For more information on industrial animal production systems and GRACE, visit www.factoryfarm.org

For more information, contact David Brubaker
Project Director Global Resource Action Center for the Environment (GRACE)
Web site: http://www.gracelinks.org


Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2001
From: CyberBrook <brook@california.com>
Subject: Bush's aid to the Taliban

I haven't yet figured out what "rogue nations" are as defined by Dubya. The Taliban rulers of Afghanistan can enslave girls and women, produce 75 percent of the world's opium supply, harbor anti-U.S. terrorists ... destroy every vestige of civilization in their own backyard, [and mark Hindus like the Nazis marked Jews,] but Dubya rewards them with a $43 million aid package . . .

James Hatfield, the controversial New York Times best-selling author of Fortunate Son: George W. Bush and the Making of an American President (http://www.softskull.com), is a frequent political commentator on radio stations across the country. He can be reached at omegapublishing@hotmail.com


From: "Razel Levine" <razel@nvinet.com>
Subject: Fw: Mysterious Contrails 2001 Events - June 23 Rally Against Chemtrails
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2001

From: "Somers Matter" <ksera@northcascades.net>

humanunderground archive 010605

RE: June 23, 2001 Rally Against Chemtrails

PRESS RELEASE -- June 5, 2001

1. Ohio Citizens Against Chemtrails http://home.earthlink.net/~ohwarriorgoddess

2. CACTUS (Citizens Against Chemtrails U.S.) http://www.geocities.com/cactusmailbox/CACTUS.html

3. Clifford E. Carnicom http://www.carnicom.com/contrails.htm

4. Lorie Kramer

RE: June 23, 2001 Rally Against Chemtrails

As reported on the front page of Washington D.C.'s "The Spotlight" newspaper this week, on Saturday, June 23, 2001 at 1:00 p.m. in front of Gate 12A at Wright Patterson Air Force Base in Ohio just outside the city of Fairborn off of Highway 444 there will be a peaceful rally against aerial chemtrails hosted by Ohio Citizens Against Chemtrails. For those unfamiliar with the term "chemtrails" please visit the above web! sites and read below Project Reports
1 and 2 put together by a dedicated group of researchers. Detailed information about the rally can be found at the website of Ohio Citizens Against Chemtrails listed above. The event will be locally televised and a great many radio interviews will take place pre and post rally. So far citizens from approximately 10 states have confirmed they will attend - but we want all states represented! We are also specifically calling for all patriots to attend. Speeches will all be recorded and available for the general public to review several weeks after the rally at the website of Clifford Carnicom listed above.

The media and our elected officials must be held accountable for their actions or lack of action. We cannot think of an issue more detrimental to the health and freedom of you and your children and encourage everyone to make the trek to Ohio and participate. Never in the history of civilization on the earth has there been such a complex, overwhelming array of secretive and potentially destructive experiments ongoing, the logistics of which are cloaked in deliberate lies to the citizens they ultimately affect.

Project Report

2 - June 5, 2001

We will talk about four active projects ongoing in the atmosphere across America now. The first project is an effort to block the rays of the sun from hitting the earth including the ultra violet radiation that will come through without an adequate layer of ozone in the upper regions above the earth. This, it is hoped, will lower temperature on the surface of the earth and block ultra violet radiation from causing skin cancer in humans. The aerosol is probably aluminum oxide or a compound that would have similar properties.

The second and most secretive project is the United States Navy's, RFMP, Radio Frequency Mission Planner, military program. The RFMP is the system name given to a group of computer programs and one of the supporting, subprograms within the RFMP system is called the VTRPE computer program. VTRPE is an acronym that stands for Variable Terrain Radio Parabolic Equation. It is a computer Radio Frequency propagation program that deals with radio waves and enables the RFMP system to visually see the battlefield terrain in 3 dimensions (3-D) on a television screen. The RFMP system also depends on satellites to feed their images of the battlefield into the RFMP system to be combined with the battlefield picture painted from the ground thus producing 3-D images. By providing an extremely interactive and visual (television type radar screens) environment, the Radio Frequency Mission Planner, RFMP system allows the computer operator to develop familiarity with the "Radio Frequency" environment before a battlefield war mission occurs by playing a variety of "what-if" virtual warfare scenarios on his computer screen. Since all major modes of Radio Frequency propagation are modeled in his computer, (RFMP system), special, sometimes counter-intuitive, cases can be examined in detail and exploited during a warfare battle mission. The VTRPE computer program only worked accurately over water and along coastal areas but not over land masses because the system's radar waves required an atmospheric condition known as "ducting", over land, to operate accurately. The government and military solved the "ducting" problem by releasing an aerosol, a mixture of barium salts into the atmosphere over America. They made an atmospheric RF duct with a base of barium aerosol from aircraft. The chemical and electrical characteristics of the mixture will cause water moisture to stay in clouds. Again, the aerosol sets up an electrical and chemical environment that supports RF ducting for the RFMP / VTRPE warfare system. Fibers with barium may support ducting. The mixture of barium salt aerosol when sprayed in a straight line will also provide a ducting path from point A to point B and will enable high frequency communications along that path, even over the curvature of the earth, in both directions. Enemy high frequency communications can be monitored easier with the straight line A to B ducting medium.

Barium salt chemtrails were used to support the Navy's Radio Frequency Mission Planner over Iraq and Saudi Arabia during the Gulf War.

The third project also utilizes the mixture of barium salts in the atmosphere. Weather control is a project of the U.S. Air Force and utilizes Nikola Tesla concepts of radio frequency radiation (HAARP) against the ionosphere above the earth. Fragile life support systems in our environment are being manipulated, tested and altered by government for military advantage. Air Force documents implied, "the risks are high but the rewards are worth it." The mixture of barium salts, supporting moisture, is encouraged along the weather fronts and manipulated in a control fashion. It is believed microwave energy is also utilized in the weather control program. Weather data is also a required input to the VTRPE program of the RFMP system. Perfected weather control technology will enable a military to withhold rain, cause floods, cause drought, cause storms, withhold sunshine, damage food crops, and bring any country to its knees without firing a shot.

The fourth project in the atmosphere is the DARPA, Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, biological detection and decontamination programs. The program also utilizes the mixture of barium salts as the base vehicle in aerosol along with special polymer fibers in the atmosphere. They have released biologicals into the atmosphere in trials, testing the detection and decontamination systems. It is believed that barium salt, polymer fibers, aluminum and other chemicals, in the atmosphere are the physical irritants that are either directly or indirectly responsible, for the recent nationwide epidemic increase in cases of nose bleeds, asthma, allergies, pneumonia, upper respiratory symptoms and a noticeable increase in arthritis symptoms, recently reported nationwide. Chemicals illegally sprayed into the atmosphere are producing atmospheric and ground conditions detrimental to human and animal health but favorable to the growth of harmful molds and fungus. These conditions are not conducive to good health. The soluble salts of barium, an earth metal, are toxic in mammalian systems. They are absorbed rapidly from the gastrointestinal tract and are deposited in the muscles, lungs, and bone. No case data is available from the medical community on the long term effects of barium in the human body.

The programs are secret because the Federal EPA and State Environmental Quality Agencies need to "not know" about what the by-products of the metabolites of biological, illegal and harmful agents are. It's for that reason the project ! has been declared secret from the citizens.

CLIP - To get the rest, ask it from either Razel Levine" <razel@nvinet.com> or "Somers Matter" <ksera@northcascades.net>