From: Art b Rosenblum <artr@juno.com
Cc: Stephen Kaplan <kap808@home.com; <jdecker@keelynet.com; Hal Fox <halfox@slkc.uswest.net
Sent: Friday, June 01, 2001
Subject: Re: Real UFO's & Fake "Evgray" Energy Machine

Dear Jean,

I suggest you check your energy discoveries before you publish to keep your reputation.

Back in the early 70's I was told about the Evgray motor and was very impressed. I recorded a phone call with them where they invited me to come to California and see it myself.

I let Arthur Young, inventor of the Bell Helicopter listen to the call. He was dubious but gave me the money to drive to CA and check it out which I did.

After seeing their impressive demonstration, I went to the General Motors Proving grounds and met with engineers to look for a non-destructive way to test the motor. We decided on a simple plan.

Using resistors and an ammeter we'd run down the 12 volt car battery they used to start it and when the battery was low, but not too low to start it, they could start it up and run it for however long they wished.

Then we'd use the same resistance and ammeter to discharge the battery again to see if it had more charge than it had when they started running the motor. This test could not harm their motor in any way, but would prove whether or not it was capable of re-charging the battery from which it was run.

When I returned to Evgray with that suggestion, they refused to let me in the door. I then went to the D.A. and he showed me an inch-thick stack of evidence on their fraudulent activities.

If this were not a fraud, they would have long ago been selling the motors or keeping them hidden and selling the energy back to the power company. Of course it's a fraud. You need someone to check out your science stuff before you publish it.

Now, in case you think I belittle all new or strange science ideas, see what I've been learning of the reality of UFO's and ET's. I've just had a friend in Moscow send information from the CSETI Disclosure Project computer CD to Academician Georgi Arbatov, head of the Russian Academy of Sciences whom I met with in Moscow in 1986.

If any of you want a computer CD with the whole 500 page briefing book by many UFO and ET witnesses and Prof. Salter's report of personal ET contact (on donation basis) just let me know by email: <artr@juno.com. Use "ART CD" for the Subject to be sure I see it. I'll mail it right out and you can donate later.

Peace and love, Art Rosenblum,

mailto:artr@juno.com Aquarian Research Foundation, 5620 Morton St., Philadelphia, PA 19144. Phone: 215-848-2292 day/eve. Working for a positive future for our planet since 1969. Web: http://www.ic.org/aq Listserv: mailto:fr2-subscribe@egroups.com. Use UNsubscribe to quit.




AND MY REPLY WAS:

Thanks Art for your warning on this.

Of course I'm very concerned to hear about this alleged fraud but I had really no reason to question Stephen Kaplan's credibility. Stephen is a close associate of Hal Fox whom I also trust on these things and so I trusted him entirely when I saw that. Of course I believe what you tell me Art but I'd like, before publishing your fraud-debunking email above to hear from Stephen Kaplan and possibly also from Jerry Decker to see what their take is on what you report and possibly include their comment as well.

I must mention that I also included this in my just-emailed Media compilation
12 and therefore I would have to mention your rebuttal (and possibly their comments as well) in my next Media compilation.

Hoping this will be sorted out quickly without anyone being utterly upset.

Jean




HERE ARE AS THEY CAME IN ALL THE ENSUING EMAILS

From: "kap808" <kap808@home.com
To: <drl@free-energy.ws
Cc: "Jerry W. Decker" <jdecker@keelynet.com, "jean hudon" <globalvisionary@cybernaute.com Subject: Re: Real UFO's & Fake "Evgray" Energy Machine
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001

Peter:

It was good talking with you. I look forward to reading your communication to Jean Hudon. All you need to do is present the facts as you know them, along with your credentials (which are impressive). Please send Jean a copy of your latest summary of new energy research, which I enjoyed very much.

Yours for accuracy in reporting,

Steve


From: "kap808" <kap808@home.com
To: "Jerry W. Decker" <jdecker@keelynet.com
Cc: "jean hudon" <globalvisionary@cybernaute.com, <drl@free-energy.ws
Subject: Re: Real UFO's & Fake "Evgray" Energy Machine
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001

Jerry:

I talked with Peter Lindemann about Art Rosenblum's allegations. Apparently, Gray was sometimes very uncooperative with some of the people who came to check out his motor, and Art may have been one of those folks. So you could have a situation in which Art is honestly reporting what happened when he checked out the motor in the '70's, and yet be very much in error given what we have come to know about the Gray motor.

Please get right on this, as Jean Hudon's newsletter is an important channel for getting out the truth concerning new energy R&D.

Best-

Steve




From: "kap808" <kap808@home.com
To: "jean hudon" <globalvisionary@cybernaute.com
Cc: "Jerry W. Decker" <jdecker@keelynet.com, <drl@free-energy.ws, <artr@juno.com
Subject: Fw: The World of Free Energy
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001 17:49:30 -0700

Jean:

This is an excellent summary of new energy R&D. Peter should be communicating with you soon, I hope, about his knowledge of the Gray motor. Expect to hear from Jerry Decker, too. I communicated with both of these gentlemen, whom I respect highly, about Art Rosenblum's allegations.

What we may have here is a strange case of an inventor deciding not to play straight with people he didn't like, for one reason or another. Whether that is a good way to proceed may be debatable, but given how many inventors have been hassled by all kinds of legitimate and illegitimate reviewers of technology, it becomes an understandable response in some circumstances. Both Jerry Decker and Peter Lindemann know alot about the Gray motor, and according to them, independent tests have verified the over-unity performance of the motor. Equally important is the theoretical analysis Peter will be presenting at the conference regarding why the motor works. He will be making a presentation relating Gray's work to the pioneering work of Nicola Tesla.

I suggest that Art Rosenblum and other critics would be well advised to either attend the conference or closely examine what is published following the conference before jumping to conclusions, no matter what they may or may not have observed in the 1970's or at any other time.

Feel free to publish paragraphs two and three of this communication in your newsletter.

Best- Steve
-- Original Message
--

From: Stephen Kaplan <kap808@eudoramail.com To: <kap808@home.com Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2001 9:40 PM Subject: Fwd: The World of Free Energy


--- Forwarded Message ---

DATE: Thu, 31 May 2001 20:04:48
From: "Remy C." <remyc@prodigy.net
To: "End Secrecy List" <endsecrecy@yahoogroups.com

(He nailed it! Remy C.)

From: http://free-energy.cc

Published March 1st 2001

The World of Free Energy By Peter Lindemann, D.Sc.

In the late 1880's, trade journals in the electrical sciences were predicting "free electricity" in the near future. Incredible discoveries about the nature of electricity were becoming common place. Nikola Tesla was demonstrating "wireless lighting" and other wonders associated with high frequency currents. There was an excitement about the future like never before.

Within 20 years, there would be automobiles, airplanes, movies, recorded music, telephones, radio, and practical cameras. The Victorian Age was giving way to something totally new. For the first time in history, common people were encouraged to envision a utopian future, filled with abundant modern transportation and communication, as well as jobs, housing and food for everyone. Disease would be conquered, and so would poverty. Life was getting better, and this time, everyone was going to get "a piece of the pie." So, what happened? In the midst of this technological explosion, where did the energy breakthroughs go? Was all of this excitement about "free electricity", which happened just before the beginning of the last century, all just wishful thinking that "real science" eventually disproved?

Current State of Technology

Actually, the answer to that question is NO. In fact, the opposite is true. Spectacular energy technologies were developed right along with the other breakthroughs. Since that time, multiple methods for producing vast amounts of energy at extremely low cost have been developed. None of these technologies have made it to the "open" consumer market as an article of commerce, however. Exactly why this is true will be discussed shortly. But first, I would like to describe to you a short list of "free energy" technologies that I am currently aware of, and that are proven beyond all reasonable doubt. The common feature connecting all of these discoveries, is that they use a small amount of one form of energy to control or release a large amount of a different kind of energy. Many of them tap the underlying Fther field in some way; a source of energy conveniently ignored by "modern" science.

1) Radiant Energy. Nikola Tesla's Magnifying Transmitter, T. Henry Moray's Radiant Energy Device, Edwin Gray's EMA Motor, and Paul Baumann's Testatika Machine all run on Radiant Energy. This natural energy form can be gathered directly from the environment (mistakenly called "static" electricity) or extracted from ordinary electricity by the method called "fractionation." Radiant Energy can perform the same wonders as ordinary electricity, at less than 1% of the cost. It does not behave exactly like electricity, however, which has contributed to the scientific community's misunderstanding of it. The Methernitha Community in Switzerland currently has 5 or 6 working models of fuelless, self-running devices that tap this energy.

2) Permanent Magnets. Dr. Robert Adams (NZ) has developed astounding designs of electric motors, generators and heaters that run on permanent magnets. One such device draws 100 watts of electricity from the source, generates 100 watts to recharge the source, and produces over 140 BTU's of heat in two minutes! Dr. Tom Bearden (USA) has two working models of a permanent magnet powered electrical transformer. It uses a 6-watt electrical input to control the path of a magnetic field coming out of a permanent magnet. By channeling the magnetic field, first to one output coil and then a second output coil, and by doing this repeatedly and rapidly in a "Ping-Pong" fashion, the device can produce a 96-watt electrical output with no moving parts. Bearden calls his device a Motionless Electromagnetic Generator, or MEG. Jean-Louis Naudin has duplicated Bearden's device in France. The principles for this type of device were first disclosed by Frank Richardson (USA) in 1978. Troy Reed (USA) has working models of a special magnetized fan that heats up as it spins. It takes exactly the same amount of energy to spin the fan whether it is generating heat or not. Beyond these developments, multiple inventors have identified working mechanisms that produce motor torque from permanent magnets alone.

3) Mechanical Heaters. There are two classes of machines that transform a small amount of mechanical energy into a large amount of heat. The best of these purely mechanical designs are the rotating cylinder systems designed by Frenette (USA) and Perkins (USA). In these machines, one cylinder is rotated within another cylinder with about an eighth of an inch of clearance between them. The space between the cylinders is filled with a liquid such as water or oil, and it is this "working fluid" that heats up as the inner cylinder spins. Another method uses magnets mounted on a wheel to produce large eddy currents in a plate of aluminum, causing the aluminum to heat up rapidly. These magnetic heaters have been demonstrated by Muller (Canada), Adams (NZ) and Reed (USA). All of these systems can produce ten times more heat than standard methods using the same energy input.

4) Super-Efficient Electrolysis. Water can be broken into Hydrogen and Oxygen using electricity. Standard chemistry books claim that this process requires more energy than can be recovered when the gases are recombined. This is true only under the worst case scenario. When water is hit with its own molecular resonant frequency, using a system developed by Stan Meyers (USA) and again recently by Xogen Power, Inc., it collapses into Hydrogen and Oxygen gas with very little electrical input. Also, using different electrolytes (additives that make the water conduct electricity better) changes the efficiency of the process dramatically. It is also known that certain geometric structures and surface textures work better than others do. The implication is that unlimited amounts of Hydrogen fuel can be made to drive engines (like in your car) for the cost of water. Even more amazing is the fact that a special metal alloy was patented by Freedman (USA) in 1957 that spontaneously breaks water into Hydrogen and Oxygen with no outside electrical input and without causing any chemical changes in the metal itself. This means that this special metal alloy can make Hydrogen from water for free, forever.

5) Implosion/Vortex. All major industrial engines use the release of heat to cause expansion and pressure to produce work, like in your car engine. Nature uses the opposite process of cooling to cause suction and vacuum to produce work, like in a tornado. Viktor Schauberger (Austria) was the first to build working models of Implosion Engines in the 1930's and 1940's. Since that time, Callum Coats has published extensively on Schauberger's work in his book Living Energies and subsequently, a number of researchers have built working models of Implosion Turbine Engines. These are fuelless engines that produce mechanical work from energy accessed from a vacuum. There are also much simpler designs that use vortex motions to tap a combination of gravity and centrifugal force to produce a continuous motion in fluids.

6) Cold Fusion. In March 1989, two Chemists from Brigham Young University in Utah (USA) announced that they had produced atomic fusion reactions in a simple tabletop device. The claims were "debunked" within 6 months and the public lost interest. Nevertheless, Cold Fusion is very real. Not only ha excess heat production been repeatedly documented, but also low energy atomic element transmutation has been catalogued, involving dozens of different reactions! This technology definitely can produce low cost energy and scores of other important industrial processes.

7) Solar Assisted Heat Pumps. The refrigerator in your kitchen is the only "free energy machine" you currently own. It's an electrically operated heatpump. It uses one amount of energy (electricity) to move three amounts of energy (heat). This gives it a "co-efficient of performance" (COP) of about 3. Your refrigerator uses one amount of electricity to pump three amounts of heat from the inside of the refrigerator to the outside of the refrigerator. This is its typical use, but it is the worst possible way to use the technology. Here's why. A heat pump pumps heat from the "source" of heat to the "sink" or place that absorbs the heat. The "source" of heat should obviously be HOT and the "sink" for heat should obviously be COLD for this process to work the best. In your refrigerator, it's exactly the opposite. The "source" of heat is inside the box, which is COLD, and the "sink" for heat is the room temperature air of your kitchen, which is warmer than the source. This is why the COP remains low for your kitchen refrigerator. But this is not true for all heat pumps. COP's of 8 to 10 are easily attained with solar assisted heat pumps. In such a device, a heat pump draws heat from a solar collector and dumps the heat into a large underground absorber, which remains at 550 F, and mechanical energy is extracted in the transfer. This process is equivalent to a steam engine that extracts mechanical energy between the boiler and the condenser, except that it uses a fluid that "boils" at a much lower temperature than water. One such system that was tested in the 1970's produced 350 hp, measured on a Dynamometer, in a specially designed engine from just 100-sq. ft. of solar collector. (This is NOT the system promoted by Dennis Lee.) The amount of energy it took to run the compressor (input) was less than 20 hp, so this system produced more than 17 times more energy than it took to keep it going! It could power a small neighborhood from the roof of a hot tub gazebo, using exactly the same technology that keeps the food cold in your kitchen. Currently, there is an industrial scale heat pump system just north of Kona, Hawaii that generates electricity from temperature differences in ocean water.

There are dozens of other systems that I have not mentioned, many of them are as viable and well tested as the ones I have just recounted. But this short list is sufficient to make my point: free energy technology is here, now. It offers the world pollution-free, energy abundance for everyone, everywhere. It is now possible to stop the production of "greenhouse gases" and shut down all of the nuclear power plants. We can now desalinate unlimited amounts of seawater at an affordable price, and bring adequate fresh water to even the most remote habitats. Transportation costs and the production costs for just about everything can drop dramatically. Food can even be grown in heated greenhouses in the winter, anywhere. All of these wonderful benefits that can make life on this planet so much easier and better for everyone have been postponed for decades. Why? Whose purposes are served by this postponement?

The Invisible Enemy

There are four gigantic forces that have worked together to create this situation. To say that there is and has been a "conspiracy" to suppress this technology only leads to a superficial understanding of the world, and it places the blame for this completely outside of ourselves. Our willingness to remain ignorant and actionless in the face of this situation has always been interpreted by two of these forces as "implied consent." So, besides a "non-demanding public," what are the other three forces that are impeding the availability of free energy technology?

In standard economic theory, there are three classes of Industry. These are Capital, Goods, and Services. Within the first class, Capital, there are also three sub-classes. These are: 1) Natural Capital. This relates to raw materials (such as a gold mine) and sources of energy (such as a hydroelectric dam or an oil well). 2) Currency. This relates to the printing of paper "money" and the minting of coins. These functions are usually the job of Government. And 3) Credit. This relates to the loaning of money for interest and its extension of economic value through deposit loan accounts. From this, it is easy to see, that energy functions in the economy in the same way as gold, the printing of money by the Government, or the issuing of credit by a bank.

In the United States, and in most other countries around the world, there is a "money monopoly" in place. I am "free" to earn as much "money" as I want, but I will only be paid in Federal Reserve Notes. There is nothing I can do to be paid in Gold Certificates, or some other form of "money." This money monopoly is solely in the hands of a small number of private stock banks, and these banks are owned by the Wealthiest Families in the world. Their plan is to eventually control 100% of all of the Capital resources of the world, and thereby control everyone's life through the availability (or non-availability) of all goods and services. An independent source of wealth (free energy device) in the hands of each and every person in the world, ruins their plans for world domination, permanently. Why this is true is easy to see. Currently, a nation's economy can be either slowed down or sped up by the raising or lowering of interest rates. But if an independent source of capital (energy) were present in the economy, and any business or person could raise more capital without borrowing it from a bank, this centralized throttling action on interest rates would simply not have the same effect. Free energy technology changes the value of money. The Wealthiest Families and the Issuers of Credit do not want any competition. It's that simple. They want to maintain their current monopoly control of the money supply. For them, free energy technology is not just something to suppress, it must be PERMANENTLY FORBIDDEN!

So, the Wealthiest Families and their Central Banking institutions are the First Force operating to postpone the public availability of free energy technology. Their motivations are the imagined "divine right to rule", greed, and their insatiable need to control everything except themselves. The weapons they have used to enforce this postponement include intimidation, "expert" debunkers, buying and shelving of technology, murder and attempted murder of the inventors, character assassination, arson, and a wide variety of financial incentives and disincentives to manipulate possible supporters. They have also promoted the general acceptance of a scientific theory that states that free energy is impossible (Laws of Thermodynamics).

The Second Force operating to postpone the public availability of free energy technology is National Governments. The problem here is not so much related to competition in the printing of currency, but in the maintenance of National Security. The fact is, the world out there is a jungle, and humans can be counted upon to be very cruel, dishonest, and sneaky. It is Government's job to "provide for the common defense." For this, "police powers" are delegated by the Executive Branch of Government to enforce "the rule of law." Most of us who consent to the rule of law do so because we believe it is the right thing to do, for our own benefit. There are always a few individuals, however, that believe that their own benefit is best served by behavior that does not voluntarily conform to the generally agreed upon social order. These people choose to operate outside of "the rule of law" and are considered outlaws, criminals, subversives, traitors, revolutionaries, or terrorists.

Most National Governments have discovered, by trial and error, that the only Foreign Policy that really works, over time, is a policy called "Tit for Tat." What this means to you and me is, that governments treat each other the way they are being treated. There is a constant "jockeying" for position and influence in world affairs, and the STRONGEST party wins! In economics, it's the Golden Rule, which states: "The one with the Gold makes the Rules." So it is with politics also, but its appearance is more Darwinian. It's simply "survival of the fittest." In politics, however, the "fittest" has come to mean the strongest party who is also willing to fight the dirtiest. Absolutely every means available is used to maintain an advantage over the "adversary", and everyone else is the "adversary" regardless of whether they are considered friend or foe. This includes outrageous psychological posturing, lying, cheating, spying, stealing, assassination of world leaders, proxy wars, alliances and shifting alliances, treaties, foreign aid, and the presence of military forces wherever possible. Like it or not, this IS the psychological and actual arena National Governments operate in. No National Government will ever do anything that simply gives an adversary an advantage for free. NEVER! It's national suicide. Any activity by any individual, inside or outside the country, that is interpreted as giving an adversary an edge or advantage, in any way, will be deemed a threat to "National Security." ALWAYS!

Free energy technology is a National Government's worst nightmare! Openly acknowledged, free energy technology sparks an unlimited arms race by all governments in a final attempt to gain absolute advantage and domination. Think about it. Do you think Japan will not feel intimidated if China gets free energy? Do you think Israel will sit by quietly as Iraq acquires free energy? Do you think India will allow Pakistan to develop free energy? Do you think the USA would not try to stop Osama bin Laden from getting free energy? Unlimited energy available to the current state of affairs on this planet leads to an inevitable reshuffling of the "balance of power." This could become an all-out war to prevent "the other" from having the advantage of unlimited wealth and power. Everybody will want it, and at the same time, want to prevent everyone else from getting it.

So, National Governments are the Second Force operating to postpone the public availability of free energy technology. Their motivations are "self-preservation." This self-preservation operates on three levels. First, by not giving undue advantage to an external enemy. Second, by preventing individualized action capable of effectively challenging official police powers (anarchy) within the country. And third, by preserving income streams derived from taxing energy sources currently in use. Their weapons include the preventing of the issuance of patents based on National Security grounds, the legal and illegal harassment of inventors with criminal charges, tax audits, threats, phone taps, arrest, arson, theft of property during shipment, and a host of other intimidations which make the business of building and marketing a free energy machine impossible.

The Third Force operating to postpone the public availability of free energy technology consists of the group of deluded inventors and out right charlatans and con men. On the periphery of the extraordinary scientific breakthroughs that constitute the real free energy technologies, lies a shadow world of unexplained anomalies, marginal inventions and unscrupulous promoters. The first two Forces have constantly used the media to promote the worst examples of this group, to distract the public's attention and to discredit the real breakthroughs by associating them with the obvious frauds.

Over the last hundred years, dozens of stories have surfaced about unusual inventions. Some of these ideas have so captivated the public's imagination that a mythology about these systems continues to this day. Names like Keely, Hubbard, Coler, and Henderschott immediately come to mind. There may be real technologies behind these names, but there simply isn't enough technical data available in the public domain to make a determination. These names remain associated with a free energy mythology, however, and are sited by debunkers as examples of fraud. The idea of free energy taps very deeply into the human subconscious mind. A few inventors with marginal technologies that demonstrate useful anomalies have mistakenly exaggerated the importance of their inventions. Some of these inventors also have mistakenly exaggerated the importance of THEMSELVES for having invented it. A combination of "gold fever" and/or a "messiah complex" appears, wholly distorting any future contribution they may make. While the research thread they are following may hold great promise, they begin to trade enthusiasm for facts, and the value of the scientific work from that point on suffers greatly. There is a powerful, yet subtle seduction that can warp a personality if they believe that "the world rests on their shoulders" or that they are the world's "savior." Strange things also happen to people when they think they are about to become extremely rich. It takes a tremendous spiritual discipline to remain objective and humble in the presence of a working free energy machine. Many inventors' psyches become unstable just BELIEVING they have a free energy machine. As the quality of the science deteriorates, some inventors also develop a "persecution complex" that makes them very defensive and unapproachable. This process precludes them from ever really developing a free energy machine, and fuels the fraud mythologies tremendously.

Then there are the out right con men. In the last 15 years, there is one person in the USA who has raised the free energy con to a professional art. He has raised more than $100,000,000, has been barred from doing business in the State of Washington, has been jailed in California, and he's still at it. He always talks about a variation of one of the real free energy systems, sells people on the idea that they will get one of these systems soon, but ultimately sells them only promotional information which gives no real data about the energy system itself. He has mercilessly preyed upon the Christian Community and the Patriot Community in the USA, and is still going strong. His current scam involves signing up hundreds of thousands of people as locations where he will install a free energy machine. In exchange for letting him put the FE generator in their home, they will get free electricity for life, and his company will sell the excess energy back to the local utility company. After becoming convinced that they will receive free electricity for life, with no out-front expenses, they gladly buy a video that helps draw their friends into the scam as well. Once you understand the power and motivations of the first two Forces I have discussed, its obvious that this person's current "business plan" cannot be implemented. This one person has probably done more harm to the free energy movement in the USA than any other Force, by destroying people's trust in the technology.

So, the Third Force postponing the public availability of free energy technology is delusion and dishonesty within the movement itself. The motivations are self-aggrandizement, greed, want of power over others, and a false sense of self-importance. The weapons used are lying, cheating, the "bait and switch" con, self-delusion and arrogance combined with lousy science.

The Fourth Force operating to postpone the public availability of free energy technology is all of the rest of us. It may be easy to see how narrow and despicable the motivations of the other Forces are, but actually, these motivations are still very much alive in each of us as well. Like the Wealthiest Families, don't we each secretly harbor illusions of false superiority, and the want to control others instead of ourselves? Also, wouldn't you "sell out" if the price were high enough, say, take $1 million dollars, cash, today? Or like the Governments, don't we each want to ensure our own survival? If caught in the middle of a full, burning theater, do you panic and push all of the weaker people out of the way in a mad, scramble for the door? Or like the deluded inventor, don't we trade a comfortable illusion once in a while for an uncomfortable fact? And don't we like to think more of ourselves than others give us credit for? Or don't we still fear the unknown, even if it promises a great reward?

You see, really, all Four Forces are just different aspects of the same process, operating at different levels in the society. There is really only ONE FORCE preventing the public availability of free energy technology, and that is the unspiritually motivated behavior of the human animals. In the last analysis, free energy technology is an outward manifestation of Divine Abundance. It is the engine of the economy of an enlightened society, where people voluntarily behave in a respectful and civil manner toward each other. Where each member of the society has everything they need, and do not covet what their neighbor has. Where war and physical violence has become socially unacceptable behavior and people's differences are at least tolerated, if not enjoyed.

The appearance of free energy technology in the public domain is the dawning of a truly civilized age. It is an epochal event in human history. Nobody can "take credit" for it. Nobody can "get rich" on it. Nobody can "rule the world" with it. It is simply, a Gift from God. It forces us all to take responsibility for our own actions and for our own self-disciplined self-restraint when needed. The world as it is currently ordered, cannot have free energy technology without being totally transformed by it into something else. This "civilization" has reached the pinnacle of its development, because it has birthed the seeds of its own transformation. The unspiritualized human animals cannot be trusted with free energy. They will only do what they have always done, which is take merciless advantage of each other, or kill each other and themselves in the process.

If you go back and read Ayn Rand's Atlas Shrugged or the Club of Rome Report, it becomes obvious that the Wealthiest Families have understood this for decades. Their plan is to live in The World of Free Energy, but permanently freeze the rest of us out. But this is not new. Royalty has always considered the general population (us) to be their subjects. What is new, is that you and I can communicate with each other now better than at anytime in the past. The Internet offers us, the Fourth Force, an opportunity to overcome the combined efforts of the other Forces preventing free energy technology from spreading.

The Opportunity

What is starting to happen is that inventors are publishing their work, instead of patenting it and keeping it secret. More and more, people are "giving away" information on these technologies in books, videos and websites. While there is still a great deal of useless information about free energy on the Internet, the availability of good information is rising rapidly. Check out the list of websites and other resources at the end of this article.

It is imperative that you begin to gather all of the information you can on real free energy systems. The reason for this is simple. The first two Forces will never allow an inventor or a company to build and sell a free energy machine to you! The only way you will ever get one is if you, or a friend, build it yourself. This is exactly what thousands of people are already quietly starting to do. You may feel wholly inadequate to the task, but start gathering information now. You may be just a link in the chain of events for the benefit of others. Focus on what you can do now, not on how much there still is to be done. Small, private research groups are working out the details as you read this. Many are committed to publishing their results on the Internet.

All of us constitute the Fourth Force. If we stand up and refuse to remain ignorant and action-less, we can change the course of history. It is the aggregate of our combined action that can make a difference. Only the mass action that represents our consensus can create the world we want. The other three Forces WILL NOT help us put a fuelless power plant in our basements. They will not help us be free from their manipulations. Nevertheless, free energy technology is here. It is real, and it will change everything about the way we live, work and relate to each other. In the last analysis, free energy technology obsoletes greed and the fear for survival. But like all exercises of Spiritual Faith, we must first manifest the generosity and trust in our own lives.

The Source of Free Energy is INSIDE of us. It is that excitement of expressing ourselves freely. It is our Spiritually guided intuition expressing itself without distraction, intimidation or manipulation. It is our open-heartedness. Ideally, the free energy technologies underpin a just society where everyone has enough food, clothing, shelter, self-worth, and the leisure time to contemplate the higher Spiritual meanings of Life. Do we not owe it to each other, to face down our fears, and take action to create this future for our children's children? Perhaps I am not the only one waiting for me to act on a greater Truth.

Free energy technology is here. It has been here for decades. Communications technology and the Internet have torn the veil of secrecy off of this remarkable fact. People all over the world are starting to build free energy devices for their own use. The Bankers and the Governments do not want this to happen, but cannot stop it. Tremendous economic instabilities and wars will be used in the near future to distract people from joining the free energy movement. There will be essentially no major media coverage of this aspect of what is going on. It will simply be reported as wars and civil wars erupting everywhere, leading to UN "Peace Keeper" occupation in more and more countries.

Western Society is spiraling down toward self-destruction, due to the accumulated effects of long-term greed and corruption. The general availability of free energy technology cannot stop this trend. It can only reinforce it. If, however, you have a free energy device, you may be better positioned to survive the political/social/economic transition that is underway. No National Government will survive this process. The question is, who will ultimately control the emerging World Government, the First Force, or the Fourth Force?

The last Great War is almost upon us. The seeds are planted. After this will come the beginning of a real Civilization. Some of us who refuse to fight will survive to see the dawn of the World of Free Energy. I challenge you to be among the ones who try.

LIST OF RESOURCES:

Books: Living Energies by Callum Coats The Free Energy Secrets of Cold Electricity by Peter Lindemann, D.Sc. Applied Modern 20th Century Aether Science by Dr. Robert Adams Physics Without Einstein by Dr. Harold Aspden Secrets of Cold War Technology by Gerry Vassilatos The Coming Energy Revolution by Jeane Manning

Websites: http://www2.murray.net.au/users/egel/content1.htm developed by Geoff Egel in Australia. Best free-energy site on the net! http://www.free-energy.cc developed by Clear Tech, Inc. and Dr. Peter Lindemann http://jnaudin.free.fr developed by JLN Labs in France http://www.1dove.com/fe/index.html Jim's Free Energy Page in the USA http://www.keelynet.com/ developed by Jerry Decker in the USA http://www.xogen.com site for super electrolysis technology http://www.rumormillnews.com excellent site for all kinds of alternative news, with many links

Patents: (most can be viewed at ) This list is nothing more than a sample of inventions that produce free energy.

Tesla USP
685,957 Freedman USP
2,796,345 Richardson USP
4,077,001 Frenette USP
4,143,639 Perkins USP
4,424,797 Gray USP
4,595,975 Meyer USP
4,936,961 Chambers USP
6,126,794

This site is best viewed with the latest version of

or

Clear Tech, Inc. Box 37 Metaline Falls, WA 99153 ph: (509) 446-2353 fax: (509) 446-2354 Order Line Only: 1-888-260-2770




Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2001
From: "Jerry W. Decker" <jdecker@keelynet.com>
To: jean hudon <globalvisionary@cybernaute.com>
CC: artr@juno.com
Subject: Re: Real UFO's & Fake "Evgray" Energy Machine

Hi Jean et al!

The notice of the 'press release' I wrote up for Stephen is posted at;

http://www.escribe.com/science/keelynet/m10190.html

This is the 'rebuttal' to the comment made to that;

Thanks for passing that on, for what its worth....

There is NO CONNECTION between Ed Gray and UFOs but it is a common flaw I've seen with 'believers' and followers of lights in the sky, mixing information to draw attention or just to further illustrate confusion.......at one time I was president of the Dallas MUFON group and on the board of directors for several years, during those years we had the biggest monthly attendance in the country on the order of 200-500 per month with all the then hot speakers, Hopkins, Mr. Ed, Walton, the Pascagoula guys and many I don't remember at the moment, so I've been there, recognized the wastelands OF NO PROOF and chose to devote my time, efforts and resources to pursuits I CAN DO SOMETHING ABOUT.

The FACT is the EV Gray motors have been found and will be shown. The FACT is the additional equipment such as the power conversion tube is still being sought. The FACT is Doug Konzen will demonstrate his version of a pulse motor which is similar to Grays motor.

Peter Lindemann has found an astonishing connection between Teslas sudden switch to unidirectional current devices which lead to phenomena he had never before been able to produce, based on what is now termed the 'electro-radiant effect'. Gray included a version of Teslas circuit in his design calling it a power conversion tube and later patented the tube design itself as the 'force multiplier' in his circuitry.

All this is posted as supporting information at http://www.keelynet.com/knconf.htm for those who take the time to look and do some CURRENT RESEARCH.

I happen to have had the fortune to communicate with many people in this field over the years and find that ATTITUDE will go FAR in gaining access and information. Nothing ticks an inventor off more than people who don't do their homework or who make demands. I know I've ticked off a few in my time who made claims and when I asked them for proof in the form of a POP (proof of principle - a simple circuit or design to prove the basic claim), they come all unglued and usually disappear over time or jump to a new scam...see Dennis Lee as the master...<g>...

I have not seen any of these motors work as claimed, not Gray nor anyone else to date.

I have relied only on the many reports of credible witnesses who did investigate them when Gray was alive. Since the motors are real and available, the people who have them are trying to duplicate Grays results. If, after following the known experiments and protocols, they FAIL to do so, you can bet we will report the failure at KeelyNet as I have known Norm Wootan for many years and I trust him with my life, property or money. If he says it, you can take it to the bank. He said the motors had been found, then invited me over to see them on two occasions, once before they were taken apart and after, both times allowing photographs and an interview with Joe Gordon who was a close friend and financial partner of Ed Gray. All that was posted at KeelyNet thanks to Norm.

What makes the conference timely is Peters discovery of the Tesla connection and the concerns of so many people about gasoline prices and electricity outages.

The conference is intended to allow people to examine the motors, the technology behind them, Peters new connection to the motor and Kontzens working pulse motor which he tells me has put out as much as 4 times the input but I did not advertise that because I do not know if it is true.

The conference DOES NOT ADVERTISE OVERUNITY as having been achieved.

The title 'fake evgray machine' is incorrect. These are the REAL EVGray machines PERIOD. Whether they work as EV Gray claimed has yet to be determined which the conference is all about.

Gray is now dead, the motors are still around, new information is available which has some of us excited because it ties in with Teslas unidirectional pulse experiments and leads to possibly a new understanding of what EV Gray meant by 'splitting the positive'.

Look at the KeelyNet site, http://www.keelynet.com/main.htm and you'll see it posted EVERYWHERE, there ARE NO working self running free energy devices that are available as a basic kit, model or planset (which works) that anyone can build or buy.....

You think not? You say there are working free energy machines??? WOW!!! Well send the URL or plans or where to buy the kit or model, etc....

Oh, can't do that? I see....government suppression...oh yes....oil companies, yes lets not forget about them....more like inventors lying for money or fame, some just for ego, perhaps even dying with a real secret...

In the case of GRAY, that appears to be the case....check into Peters power conversion tube connection, you'll see why we'd given up Gray as LOST, no motors, no inventor, the man is gone....but NOW, we have MOTORS, we have new insights, so pull that bad daddy out and lets put on our thinking caps, DO OUR HOMEWORK and see if we can make them work and produce the same phenomena Gray did.

You know, its interesting when someone slams an inventor as a scam...I mean, when that inventor has actually PRODUCED phenomena that no one else can produce using ANY OTHER MEANS....can you take a small battery as Gray did and;

http://free-energy.ws/images/Img0002.jpg

Gray showed this TATTLER reporter a small 15-amp motorcycle battery. It was hooked up to a pair of his capacitors which in turn were hooked up to a panel of outlets. He flicked a switch and the tiny battery sent a charge into the capacitors. He then plugged in six 15-watt electric light bulbs on individual cords - a 110 volt portable television set and two radios. The bulbs burned brightly, the television set played and both radios blared - and, yet, the small battery was NOT DISCHARGING.

..."May I prove it doesn't come from any wall plug?" Gray offered. A 40 watt light bulb screwed into an ordinary extension socket was plugged into the power panel by Gray's system. The bulb lit, then Gray DROPPED IT INTO A CYLINDER FILLED WITH WATER. "What would be happening if this was getting ordinary power right now?" Gray asked, as he stuck his hand in the water WITH THE GLOWING BULB.

"You'd be ELECTROCUTED and that thing would be POPPING AND SPUTTERING UNTIL THE FUSES BLEW," Wood replied. This reporter (Tom Valentine) then put his finger INTO THE WATER WITH THE LIGHT - NO SHOCK.

"Gentlemen, this is a new manifestation of electricity," Hackenberger said.

I don't know about you, but I can't do that and don't know of anyone else who can, free energy or not, it appears to be the infamous 'cold current' that so many of us have been trying to get a handle on. Sparks that produce frost, etc..

I'm not a believer in GRAY or anyone else YET simply because I've never seen a working self-running overunity device and none has been produced which anyone can prove as a proof of principle (POP) as posted at http://www.keelynet.com/pop.htm but it has certainly not quenched my view that it is possible to extract energy from gravity, aether/zpe, magnetism, multi-spectral EM or other forces.

Maybe Gray was a fraud but at this point, it hasn't been proven, duplicated or disproven to any degree GOOD ENOUGH FOR ME which is why this conference is being hosted at I might add considerable cost, effort and risk. No, I don't mean fear of suppression, I mean losing a lot of money by having enough confidence that enough intelligent, interested people will show up and at least pay back my investment.

If you REALLY want something POSITIVE to happen, you have to TAKE RISKS, get off the MOUSE and DO SOMETHING...with the rediscovery of the motors and the quite amazing Tesla connection from Lindemann as well as the Kontzen pulse motors, the SYNCHRONICITY is just too much to ignore. There is also something new from Bedini that is in the works which ties in but he will announce that in time.

Two other files that some might find of interest;

http://www.keelynet.com/primer.htm http://www.keelynet.com/zpe/chaos.htm

There are so many other devices and claims out there which have not proven out, here we have the actual machine and the people involved are trying to put it all together for commercialization and to DO SOMETING POSITIVE while they are here to help make the world a better place....if the report of 31 days self-running while under various loads is correct, AND this can be replicated, then we have it. If not, fine, either continue with variations or discard it and start afresh.

BEAR IN MIND HOWEVER the superb work of John Bedini which also uses a pulse motor system and reports overunity results, from a continuously recharging battery. Here is some additional info about duplications of Bedinis work;

http://www.keelynet.com/bedmot/bedmot.htm
http://www.escribe.com/science/keelynet/m8182.html
http://www.escribe.com/science/keelynet/m8581.html
http://www.keelynet.com/bedmot/callow1.htm

Kontzens motor; http://www.escribe.com/science/keelynet/m8314.html
http://www.geocities.com/koneheadx/

book on high voltage that shows how to make high voltage coils as used by Gray, also water arc and electrolysis (hydrogen from water);

http://www.keelynet.com/febook.htm

Lets be clear and FOCUSED here without promoting a 500 page UFO compilation for donations...

this is about EV Gray,

this is about a man now dead but with hardware that is now found thanks to Norm, Ken and Joe for starters,

this is about a NEW CONNECTION TO TESLA thanks to Peter Lindemanns efforts which causes those WHO TAKE THE TIME TO INVESTIGATE IT to view Grays motor and claims in an entirely different light.

Throw the machines away? Let them be recycled as scrap? Destroy all the many documents which have also been found? Give it all up because someone ticked Gray off long ago so he refused THEIR tests?

I don't think so, with the world requiring ever more energy and the POSSIBILITY of a self-running device FROM ANY SOURCE that also will drive a small load, it would be STUPID to throw it away.

We'll take our chances and continue to work on such projects, sharing information and trying to do something positive, let Mr. Rosenblum stick with the UFO compilations and stay away from hardware.




From: "kap808" <kap808@home.com>
To: "jean hudon" <globalvisionary@cybernaute.com>
Cc: "Jerry W. Decker" <jdecker@keelynet.com>, <artr@juno.com>
Subject: Re: Real UFO's & Fake "Evgray" Energy Machine
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001

Jean:

I've forwarded Art's claims to Jerry Decker for review and comment. I very much trust what Jerry has to say on these matters, and doubly so because he is backed up by Peter Lindemann, who has an excellent reputation in the new energy field.

Art may have had a negative experience in the early '70's, but he should not be so quick to cry "fraud" without checking his facts about what is going on currently with respect to research on the Gray motor.

Please do not publish Art's comments without giving Jerry Decker and Peter Lindemann a chance to prepare a rebuttal. It would be damaging to have Art's comments standing alone in one of your issues. If it is to be published at all, it should only be published along with commentary by Decker and/or Lindemann.

Please keep me informed. It is very important to have an extremely fair and open forum concerning controversies in the field.

Best

Steve




Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2001
From: peterl <peterl@iomet.com>
To: kap808 <kap808@home.com>
CC: jean hudon <globalvisionary@cybernaute.com>, "Jerry W. Decker" <jdecker@keelynet.com>, drl@free-energy.ws, artr@juno.com
Subject: Re: Fw: The World of Free Energy

Dear Steve,

Thanks for your efforts toward straightening out this "controversy" concerning the EVGray motor. The bottom line is that numerous, reputible people, including John Bedini, witnessed full power dynamometer tests of Ed Gray's motor in his lab in Van Nuys, California, in the 1970's and early 1980's. John reported to me that he personally saw the motor produce 80 horsepower on the dyno!

The gain in energy in this system was over 100-to-1 and Gray was throwing energy away whenever he had too much. Even though his motor patent suggests that he was capturing the collapsing magnetic fields and putting this energy back in the batteries, none of his machines actually included this feature. Gray routinely put an ordinary automibile alternator on the motor and recharged the batteries from the tremendous motor torque developed by the system. This can easily be verified with photographs.

All of this was not understood until I was able to correlate Gray's other two patents with Tesla's early work with HV pulsed DC arc discharges, and the tremendous radiant electrostatic charge effects that result. It took 27 years of hard work to figure out the "gain mechanism" in Gray's system. I submit to you that Gray's refusal to submit to the "drain the battery first" test was sane and reasonable. Gray routinely showed people full power dynamometer tests of the motors power along with battery charge before and after.

For anyone who wants to look at all of the facts, there is no "controversy" here. The technology is very real, and very important, regardless of one man's recounting of a "refusal to submit to test" by Gray. The real fact is that Mr. Rosenblum does not have one piece of evidence in his possession that either proves or even remotely suggests that Gray was a fraud. This is his personal opinion, which is totally unsubstantiated. On the other hand, my 3 hour technical lecture titled "The Free Energy Secrets of Cold Electricity" carefully and completely lays out the mountain of evidence to understand what Gray had accomplished. This information is also available in book form, for anyone who wants to study the material and learn the truth.

I am reminded of the fact that learned men were filling chalk boards with mathematical calculations "proving" that heavier-than-air flight was impossible a full three years after the Wright Brothers flew "the Flyer" at Kitty Hawk! Real science moves slowly. I agree with Jerry. Give us a little more time to duplicate Gray's work. The scientific work will tell us the truth, not the "nay sayers."

Sincerely,

Peter Lindemann, DSc




Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2001
From: "Jerry W. Decker" <jdecker@keelynet.com>
To: peterl <peterl@iomet.com>
CC: kap808 <kap808@home.com>, jean hudon <globalvisionary@cybernaute.com>, drl@free-energy.ws, artr@juno.com
Subject: Re: Fw: The World of Free Energy

Hi Peter et al!

Agreed 120%, though it really needs to be about 300% to make it commercially viable....that means working hardware!!

The best plan I've seen yet is power a flashlight bulb from a self-running circuit as explained by Hal Puthoff with his One Watt Challenge;


http://www.zpower.net/documents/Outline_Techno.htm/a>

In fairness, the space energy community has earned some of that distrust. Scientific method calls for the publication of methodologies and the replication of findings and the compulsive, sometimes paranoid secretiveness of space energy researchers has kept that from happening.

Hal Puthoff, who is the space energy researchers unofficial ambassador to the mainstream scientific community, has issued a One-Watt Challenge that calls for an inventor to go public with the details of a device that continually generates on a stand-alone, self-powered basis.. .a minimum of at least one watt excess average output power.

Proof of this sort, he believes, would go a long way toward filling space energy s substantial credibility gap. Meanwhile he is laying a badly-needed theoretical foundation by publishing highly professional, peer-reviewed articles in all the right journals.



Just recently I received emails from Scott McKie of the PODMOD claiming to have a circuit that uses 2-9vdc flashlight batteries that provide 10kw of electricity??? I wrote him back saying I want to believe it but let's do just the flashlight bulb first...two circuits, one just batteries, the other using his circuit and run the one watt bulb to see if his circuit really does self sustain...

Always, they lose it....look at Don Smith, started out with KW, now is into MW, can't even light an LED or fluorescent tube...I know, Dan, myself and an electronics friend from Kansas (is that significant Dorothy?..<g>..) all worked on his machine to 'help him get it fixed' before an INE conference...we found a blown laser power supply and nothing else wrong...he replaced it, still no current to feed the tube or led but on stage he hooks an inverter to a battery and runs a fan...wow, FREE ENERGY AT LAST!!!

As Peter pointed out, some devolve to delusion, confusion or intentionally conning others...

Puthoff is CORRECT, one watt that runs until it burns out, ideally with no battery or a very tiny one that continues to supply power long, long after it should have (as Bedinis do, check out the 10 year old girl who won the science fair from her Bedini motor

http://www.keelynet.com/bedmot/bedmot.htm
http://www.icehouse.net/john1/

Yes, I am an unabashed fan and great admirer of John Bedini, so shoot me but I've been too lazy to build even this one.....working to fix that...

Once this IRREFUTABLE PROOF has been duplicated by many, it can be SCALED UP to produce larger powers....I'm personally a fan of what a friend calls 'perpetual batteries' which would tap aether/zpe locally, like a pinhole in a dam, just enough to power a single appliance or device....take your microwave, tv, whatever anywhere and it works, no grid, no cost except the appliance and the conversion circuit in the perpetual battery...yep, parts DO burn out, so 'perpetual' is a misnomer but we can buy another...

I think Mr. Art was using the Gray post as a way to advertise his UFO CD donation...maybe unintentionally, I don't know, personally I would rather post two SEPARATE emails and keep the threads pure, but that is from years of running the KeelyNet BBS and seeing how confusing it was for topics to be changed in midstream without a header change...in some ways reminds me of ACC, ergo, American Computer Company....

They buy parts and assemble computers, slap their label on them and sell them as unique....geez, off the shelf power supplies, memory chips, motherboards, etc...all that is really different is the label...<g>...

But no, the brilliant marketer Jack Shulman and owner of ACC came up with this slick Dennis Lee-like scam...he claims to have come across a pallet or so of scrap claimed to have been the remains of the Roswell UFO crash....

http://accpc.com/ http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/Hangar/9587/
http://www.v-j-enterprises.com/acc.html

saying his 'team of scientists' had been able to extract details of alien technology from a notebook he managed to acquire through a mystery consultant from Bell or government sources...yeah right, with all their money and technical resources, his rinky-dink company could extract the transpacitor or some such screwball claim...hmmm, might have been the flux capacitor used in Back to the Future...alien technology my grandma...

So if they can figure this out, THEIR computers must be real whiz-bang machines...maybe implicitly using alien technology!!! WOW!

Have to stay FOCUSED on the topic at hand...energy, how to produce it, ideally how to make a self sustaining generator...Gray is one of many, but the topic at hand...




AND IN RESPONSE, ART CONCLUDED:

To: globalvisionary@cybernaute.com
Cc: artr@juno.com, kap808@home.com, jdecker@keelynet.com, halfox@slkc.uswest.net
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001
Subject: Re: Real UFO's & Fake "Evgray" Energy Machine
From: art b Rosenblum <artr@juno.com>

Dear jean and all,

Thanks for your follow-up. Yes, do see what the others will say if they read your whole message at the bottom. It'd be good to indicate at the start that you have more at the end so folks will look for it.

I've been at this over 30 years and have seen some really good energy stuff, wind, solar, etc. that is being mostly ignored, but also not practical enough to replace all the pollutants.

But I've also seen a number of frauds like that one, like Dennis Lee who threatened to sue me when I uncovered his fraud and a few others. (He couldn't because I'm too poor.) Jim Jones even hinted at some violence and I was actually a bit afraid to tell all about him 10 years before Guyana, but he did not do those "suicides". It was mostly CIA action. He was bad, but not THAT bad.

It takes a lot of work to check out a fraud as the frauds are usually pretty clever. One needs help sometimes. If any of those think Evgray is for real, they should put the work into it. I did.

Peace and love, Art Rosenblum

To: kap808@home.com
Cc: globalvisionary@cybernaute.com, jdecker@keelynet.com, artr@juno.com
Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2001
Subject: Re: Real UFO's & Fake "Evgray" Energy Machine
From: art b Rosenblum <artr@juno.com>

Dear Steven and Jean,

Sure, go ahead and publish both views together and we'll see in time who is right. I drove all the way across the country on Gray's say-so and was totally polite to him. There is no reason he should have refused testing in a non-destructive manner if he was honest. Others had found good evidence of fraud there also and I'm pretty sure they'll find more in time.

In any case, there is little point in messing with Gray's device as Blacklight Power is already way ahead of him, has $30 million in funding and 35 guys working with him in a huge lab. I'm pretty sure Dr. Mills is on to something good. I only don't know if he'll bring it out to the public before we get better stuff from the ET's but let's see. I don't have any idea how close we are to that.

Peace and love, Art Rosenblum,




AND FINALLY HAL FOX ADDED THE FOLLOWING COMMENTS:

From: "Hal Fox" <halfox@qwest.net>
To: "jean hudon" <globalvisionary@cybernaute.com>, <artr@juno.com>, "Stephen Kaplan" <kap808@home.com>, <jdecker@keelynet.com>
Subject: This is the kind of information that we need
Date: Mon, 4 Jun 2001

Dear Jean,

Thanks for forwarding a copy of Art Rosenblum's description of the Evgray motor. I have yet to see a rotating device that is overunity. I believe the Tewari's development of such a motor (high voltage input and low voltage output) may be the only real over-unity rotating machine. If anyone knows of a rotating machine that is over unity, I would be pleased to learn more about it.

Best personal regards, Hal Fox, ed. J. New Energy

From: "Hal Fox" <halfox@qwest.net>
To: <jdecker@keelynet.com>, "jean hudon" <globalvisionary@cybernaute.com>, <artr@juno.com>, "Robert W (IDS) Bass" <robert.w.bass@baesystems.com>
Subject: Comments on "free energy" devices
Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001

Dear Friends,

Just in case you haven't seen our list of "working" new-energy devices, here it is:

Definition: New-energy does not include the older forms of "alternative energy" with sources from sun, wind, tide, geothermal, or biomass.

Our group has spent almost 12 years searching the world for new-energy devices. There are now four new-energy devices that have strong commercial potential that have been invented, tested, and are in some stage of being commercialized.

All four new-energy devices are patented (or patents pending) and all four appear to pass our stringent requirements:

1. The device must provide three times as much energy output as energy input.

2. The source of the energy must have a scientific basis.

3. The devices must be non-polluting, tap a large energy source, and be able to be economically manufactured, in other words, have a strong commercial potential.

The following is a list of viable new-energy devices that are JUDGED to have near-term, strong, commercial potential:

1. Devices based on high-density, electron charge clusters (six patents issued). For example, see U.S. Patent 5,018,180. Note: this is the first patent, known to us, to state that the excess energy comes from tapping the zero-point vacuum energy of space. This discovery appears to be the best candidate for providing our future energy needs. Our group [Emerging Energy Marketing Firm, Inc. (EEMF) in Salt Lake City, Utah] has the exclusive rights to all six patents that have issued in the U.S.

2. Dr. Randell Mills patented discovery of energy from water (hydrogen in water). See www.blacklightpower.com. The source of this energy is a new form of chemical energy.

3. The Russian (Koldamasov) patented process for a low-energy nuclear reactor. Reportedly, two kilowatts of electrical input provides forty kilowatts of thermal energy. The source of this energy is from relatively safe, low-energy, nuclear reactions. [Note: We have been promised a copy of the device but have not yet received it.]

4. Dr. Tom Bearden (and co-inventors) stationary electromagnetic generator (patent pending). This device apparently is also tapping the energy of space. Independent testing is currently scheduled or underway. [One replication has been reported. However, commercialization is an estimated $15 million away.]

It is estimated that any one of the above new-energy discoveries can be commercialized within two years with an estimated $15 million or less. To build a new fossil-fuel-powered, atmospheric-polluting, electrical generating plant will take at least three years and cost $100 million or more.

Our group is being privately funded for a project to demonstrate that radioactive solids can be transmuted to stable elements with a dramatic reduction in radioactivity. We have already demonstrated the capability to dramatically reduce radioactivity from radioactive liquids. (Paper presented at a meeting of the American Nuclear Society. Original inventor is the late Stan Gleeson).

Best personal regards,

Hal Fox, ed. J. New Energy







http://www.cybernaute.com/earthconcert2000">BACK TO THE FIRST HOME PAGE OF THIS SITE